• 1.

    Willett, W. et al. Meals within the Anthropocene: the EAT–Lancet Fee on wholesome diets from sustainable meals methods. Lancet 393, 447–492 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 2.

    Sustainable Wholesome Diets: Guiding Ideas (Meals and Agriculture Group, 2019).

  • 3.

    Hirvonen, Ok., Bai, Y., Headey, D. & Masters, W. A. Affordability of the EAT–Lancet reference eating regimen: a world evaluation. Lancet Glob. Well being 8, e59–e66 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 4.

    Sringmann, M. et al. Choices for conserving the meals system inside environmental limits. Nature 562, 519–525 (2018).

    ADS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 5.

    Poore, J. & Nemecek, T. Lowering meals’s environmental impacts by producers and customers. Science 360, 987–992 (2018).

    ADS 
    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 6.

    Vanham, D., Mekonnen, M. M. & Hoekstra, A. Y. Treenuts and groundnuts within the EAT–Lancet reference eating regimen: issues relating to sustainable water use. Glob. Meals Sec. 24, 100357 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 7.

    Semba, R. D. et al. Adoption of the ‘planetary well being eating regimen’ has completely different impacts on international locations’ greenhouse gasoline emissions. Nat. Meals 1, 481–484 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 8.

    Springmann, M. et al. The healthiness and sustainability of nationwide and international meals based mostly dietary tips: modelling examine. BMJ 370, m2322 (2020).

  • 9.

    Discover your option to eat greener, not an excessive amount of and be lively! (Swedish Nationwide Meals Company, 2015).

  • 10.

    Tuomisto, H. L. The complexity of sustainable diets. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 3, 720–721 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 11.

    Mekonnen, M. & Hoekstra, A. The inexperienced, blue and gray water footprint of crops and derived crop merchandise. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Talk about. 8, 763–809 (2011).

  • 12.

    Tuninetti, M., Tamea, S., D’Odorico, P., Laio, F. & Ridolfi, L. International sensitivity of high-resolution estimates of crop water footprint. Water Resour. Res. 51, 8257–8272 (2015).

    ADS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 13.

    Tamea, S., Tuninetti, M., Soligno, I. & Laio, F. Digital water commerce and water footprint of agricultural items: the 1961–2016 CWASI database. Earth Syst. Sci. Knowledge 13, 2025–2051 (2021).

    ADS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 14.

    D’Odorico, P. et al. The worldwide meals–vitality–water nexus. Rev. Geophys. 56, 456–531 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 15.

    D’Odorico, P. et al. International digital water commerce and the hydrological cycle: patterns, drivers, and socio-environmental impacts. Env. Res. Lett. 14, 053001 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 16.

    FAOSTAT (Meals and Agriculture Group); http://faostat.fao.org

  • 17.

    Gustavsson, J., Cederberg, C., Sonesson, U., Van Otterdijk, R. & Meybeck, A. International Meals Losses and Meals Waste—Extent, Causes and Prevention (Meals and Agriculture Group, 2011).

  • 18.

    Kummu, M. et al. Misplaced meals, wasted sources: international meals provide chain losses and their impacts on freshwater, cropland and fertiliser use. Sci. Whole Environ. 438, 477–489 (2012).

    ADS 
    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 19.

    International Burden of Illness Research 2015 (GBD 2015) SocioDemographic Index (SDI) 19802015 (Institute for Well being Metrics and Analysis, 2015); http://ghdx.healthdata.org/record/ihme-data/gbd-2015-socio-demographic-index-sdi-1980%E2%80%932015

  • 20.

    Afshin, A. et al. Well being results of dietary dangers in 195 international locations, 1990–2017: a scientific evaluation for the International Burden of Illness Research 2017. Lancet 393, 1958–1972 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 21.

    Bennett, M. Ok. Worldwide contrasts in meals consumption. Geogr. Rev. 31, 365–376 (1941).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 22.

    Aune, D., Ursin, G. & Veierød, M. Meat consumption and the chance of sort 2 diabetes: a scientific evaluate and meta-analysis of cohort research. Diabetologia 52, 2277–2287 (2009).

    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 23.

    Micha, R., Michas, G. & Mozaffarian, D. Unprocessed purple and processed meats and threat of coronary artery illness and sort 2 diabetes—an up to date evaluate of the proof. Curr. Atheroscler. Rep. 14, 515–524 (2012).

    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 24.

    Béné, C. et al. 5 priorities to operationalize the EAT–Lancet Fee report. Nat. Meals 1, 457–459 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 25.

    Vermeulen, S. J., Park, T., Khoury, C. Ok. & Béné, C. Altering diets and the transformation of the worldwide meals system. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1478, 3–17 (2020).

    ADS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 26.

    Miller, V. et al. Availability, affordability, and consumption of vegetables and fruit in 18 international locations throughout revenue ranges: findings from the potential city rural epidemiology (pure) examine. Lancet Glob. Well being 4, e695–e703 (2016).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 27.

    Costello, C. et al. The way forward for meals from the ocean. Nature 588, 95–100 (2020).

    ADS 
    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 28.

    Allan, J. A. Digital water—the water, meals, and commerce nexus. Helpful idea or deceptive metaphor? Water Int. 28, 106–113 (2003).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 29.

    Tuninetti, M., Ridolfi, L. & Laio, F. Ever-increasing agricultural land and water productiveness: a world multi-crop evaluation. Environ. Res. Lett. 15, 0940a2 (2020).

    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 30.

    Roache, S. A. & Gostin, L. O. The untapped energy of soda taxes: incentivizing customers, producing income, and altering company habits. Int. J. Well being Coverage Manag. 6, 489–493 (2017).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 31.

    Mason-D’Croz, D. et al. Gaps between fruit and vegetable manufacturing, demand, and really useful consumption at international and nationwide ranges: an built-in modelling examine. Lancet Planet. Well being 3, e318–e329 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 32.

    Herforth, A. & Ahmed, S. The meals setting, its results on dietary consumption, and potential for measurement inside agriculture–diet interventions. Meals Sec. 7, 505–520 (2015).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 33.

    Downs, S. M., Ahmed, S., Fanzo, J. & Herforth, A. Meals setting typology: advancing an expanded definition, framework, and methodological strategy for improved characterization of untamed, cultivated, and constructed meals environments towards sustainable diets. Meals 9, 532 (2020).

  • 34.

    The State of Meals Safety and Vitamin within the World 2020 (FAO, IFAD, UNICEF, WFP and WHO, 2020).

  • 35.

    Geyik, O., Hadjikakou, M., Karapinar, B. & Bryan, B. A. Does international meals commerce shut the dietary nutrient hole for the world’s poorest nations? Glob. Meals Sec. 28, 100490 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 36.

    Taillie, L. S., Reyes, M., Colchero, M. A., Popkin, B. & Corvalán, C. An analysis of Chile’s regulation of meals labeling and promoting on sugar-sweetened beverage purchases from 2015 to 2017: a before-and-after examine. PLoS Med. 17, e1003015 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 37.

    Davis, Ok. F. et al. Different cereals can enhance water use and nutrient provide in India. Sci. Adv. 4, eaao1108 (2018).

    ADS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 38.

    Nutritive Components (Meals and Agriculture Group, 2012); http://www.fao.org/economic/the-statistics-division-ess/publications-studies/publications/nutritive-factors/en/

  • 39.

    Human Vitality Necessities: Report of a Joint FAO/WHO/UNU Knowledgeable Session (Meals and Agriculture Group, 2004).

  • 40.

    United Nations, Division of Financial and Social Affairs, Inhabitants Division. World Inhabitants Prospects 2019 https://population.un.org/wpp/DataQuery/ (2019).

  • 41.

    Tuninetti, M., Ridolfi, L. & Laio, F. Charting out the longer term agricultural commerce and its affect on water sources. Sci. Whole Env. 714, 136626 (2020).

    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 42.

    Herrero, M. et al. Biomass use, manufacturing, feed efficiencies, and greenhouse gasoline emissions from international livestock methods. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 20888–20893 (2013).

    ADS 
    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 43.

    Aldaya, M., Chapagain, A., Hoekstra, A. & Mekonnen, M. The Water Footprint Evaluation Handbook: Setting the International Commonplace (Taylor & Francis, 2012).

  • 44.

    Tamea, S., Tuninetti, M., Soligno, I. & Laio, F. CWASI Database: Digital Water Commerce and Consumptive Water Footprint of Agricultural Merchandise (1961–2016) (Zenodo, 2020); https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3987468

  • 45.

    Kastner, T., Kastner, M. & Nonhebel, S. Tracing distant environmental impacts of agricultural merchandise from a shopper perspective. Ecol. Econ. 70, 1032–1040 (2011).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     



  • Source link

    Previous articleThis Company Is Bringing Healthy Food to Vending Machines
    Next articleRecipe: Jalapeño Poppers For Super Bowl Sunday – WCCO

    LEAVE A REPLY

    Please enter your comment!
    Please enter your name here